Objectives | Endpoints |
---|---|
Primary | |
 To evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment in patients with active PsA and inadequate efficacy and/or intolerance to a prior TNFi by assessing reduction in signs and symptoms of PsA | Proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response at Week 24 |
Major Secondary | |
 To evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab on additional measures of signs and symptoms of PsA, psoriasis, and patient well-being in TNFi-IR patients with active PsA | At Week 16, proportion of patients achieving:  • ACR20/50 responses At Week 24, proportion of patients achieving:  • IGA 0/1 response and ≥ 2-grade reduction from baselinea  • PASI 90 responsea  • ACR50/70 responses At Week 24, change from baseline in:  • HAQ-DI score  • SF-36 PCS score  • FACIT-Fatigue score Over time, the proportion of patients achieving:  • MDA  • VLDA |
Other Secondary | |
 To evaluate the safety of guselkumab in TNFi-IR patients with active PsA | For the duration of the study, through Week 112:  • Frequency and type of AEs, SAEs, AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention, infections, and injection-site reactions  • Frequency of laboratory abnormalities (chemistry, hematology) maximum toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [5.0]) grades |
 To evaluate the PK and immunogenicity of guselkumab in TNFi-IR patients with active PsA | Through Week 112b:  • Mean/median serum guselkumab concentrations over time  • Summary of incidence of antibodies to guselkumab |