Skip to main content

Exploring the influence of social support, disease activity, and fibromyalgia on the emotional well-being of women with systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Background

Systemic Lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder in which females are affected more commonly than males. In addition to the physical burden of the disease, patients with SLE are at higher risk of psychological disorders. In Jordan, there is a paucity of studies assessing the emotional well-being and psychosocial burden of SLE. This study aims to explore fibromyalgia, mental health-related problems and their association with SLE disease activity and its various manifestations.

Methods

This cross-sectional study enrolled all sequential female patients diagnosed with SLE who attended a single-provider rheumatology clinic at the Jordan University Hospital (JUH), in Amman, Jordan. Data was collected between September 2023 and March 2024. A structured questionnaire was utilized to collect demographic data as well as SLE disease features. Comorbid psychiatric disorders were assessed using PHQ-9 and GAD-7 for depression and anxiety, respectively, fibromyalgia by FiRST, disease activity by SLEDAI score, quality of life by SF-12 and perceived social support were evaluated using MSPSS.

Results

We analyzed the data of 63 female patients diagnosed with SLE. The mean age was 40.3 ± 15.3 years with a mean age of 28.3 ± 12.1 years at diagnosis. The most common manifestations were mucocutaneous and hematological manifestations each affecting 84.1% of patients. Regarding treatments, 79.4% of patients were using hydroxychloroquine and 73.0% of patients were using glucocorticoids. According to PHQ-9, 34.9% of patients had depression and 7.9% of patients had severe depression. positive FiRST screening suggestive of fibromyalgia was found in 31.7%. The mean PCS-12 scores were 41.9 ± 9.8 and the mean MCS-12 was 51.9 ± 3.4 indicating a moderate level of physical and mental health, respectively. Using multivariate logistic regression, vascular involvement (OR = 14.9, 95% CI: 1.1-202.4) were associated with depression while patients with high PCS-12 scores (OR = 0.889, 95% CI: 0.79–0.96) had lower odds of positive FiRST screening.

Conclusion

Our study showed that patients with SLE are at an increased risk of comorbid psychiatric disorders, which adds to the complexity of the disease. The management of SLE should adopt a multidisciplinary approach to address both the physical and psychosocial burdens.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the production of autoantibodies targeting cellular antigens. This disease affects multiple organs inside the human body, presenting with a wide range of symptoms and manifestations such as arthritis, kidney disease, vasculitis, mucocutaneous manifestations and nerve involvement [1, 2]. The incidence of SLE differs between different regions in the world, ranging from 0.3 to 31.5 cases per 100,000 [3]. SLE most commonly affects females at the child-bearing age, with a female-to-male ratio of 9 − 1 [4,5,6]. Historically, SLE was first recognized for its dermatological manifestations, such as the characteristic malar rash. However, in 1872 Kaposi expanded our understanding of SLE and paved the way for a broader view of lupus as a complex, multisystem disease with significant psychiatric and psychological dimensions [1].

SLE patients are at higher risk of depression compared to the general population, with a prevalence ranging between 17% and 75% [2], whereas the prevalence of fibromyalgia among patients with SLE ranges between 16.7% and 61% [7, 8]. The prevalence of anxiety among SLE patients ranges from 1.1% to 71.4% and this wide variability may be attributed to inconsistencies in measurement methods across different studies [9]. The prevalence of anxiety among SLE patients increases as the disease progresses over time which significantly impacts patients’ lives [10]. The presence of such comorbidities among SLE patients significantly contributes to the symptoms and disabilities associated with the disease [8]. The presence of poor social support, low self-efficacy and ineffective coping strategies can aggravate distress among patients [11]. The presence of strong social support is associated with psychosocial well-being [12]. This protective effect of social support on patients’ well-being was also illustrated among patients with SLE by affecting patients’ level of depression and health-related quality of life [13]. On the other hand, patients’ low disease activity is associated with a better health-related quality of life and fewer depressive symptoms among patients with SLE [14].

There is a lack of research regarding emotional well-being and mental health among female patients with SLE in the Middle East and, especially in Jordan. In this study, we aim to explore the relationship between emotional well-being and SLE by examining how depression, anxiety, fibromyalgia, and social support interact with each other and impact disease characteristics and activity. This research aims to elucidate the intricate interplay between psychological well-being and disease progression in SLE to guide future interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Methods

Study design

This study adopted a cross-sectional design and enrolled all sequential female patients diagnosed with SLE who attended a single-provider rheumatology clinic at the Jordan University Hospital (JUH), a tertiary care and teaching hospital in Amman, the capital of Jordan, that received referral for rheumatology consultations and care from across the country. Data was collected between September 2023 and December 2024. A structured questionnaire was utilized to collect demographic data and SLE disease features. The patients’ electronic medical records were reviewed to complete and confirm the data.

The study methods were in concordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist [15] and complied with published guidelines [16].

Sample size and inclusion criteria

Sequential sampling was done for all consecutive female patients who met the 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for SLE [17]. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Jordan Hospital (https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10/2023/30525), and all participants signed an informed consent form before participating in the study.

Data collection

A structured questionnaire (Supplementary) was designed and administered to patients in person after completing their regular follow-up visit to the rheumatologist, who was not present at the time of the interview. Patients’ demographic and clinical data were collected, including their sociodemographic profile (age, educational status, and occupation), SLE duration, presence of systemic illnesses or comorbid conditions, treatment regimens, smoking status, past medical history, and surgical history. The following laboratory data were extracted from the file if recent within 1 week of the interview or collected at the time of the interview: complete blood count, creatinine, urine analysis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), c- c-reactive protein (CRP), C3, C4 and ds-DNA.

Measurement of SLE disease activity

SLE disease activity was assessed using the SELENA-SLEDAI (Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index) [18]. SELENA-SLEDAI is a twenty-four-item tool that is used to assess SLE activity. Each item has a weight quantified numerically from 1 to 8; scores of each item are summed, yielding the final score, with 0 and 105 being the minimum and maximum scores possible, respectively. Even though the maximum possible score is 105, scores above 45 are rarely observed in clinical practice [19].

Measurement of the psychological well-being of the patients

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scales were utilized to assess depression and anxiety among patients, respectively, and the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) was used to screen for fibromyalgia. Patients were administered the validated Arabic version of these questionnaires which have Cronbach’s alpha scores of 0.857 amd 0.87 for PHQ-9 and GAD-7, respectively [20, 21].

PHQ-9 is a nine-item tool used to screen and determine the severity of depression. Patients with scores equal to or above ten were considered positive [22]. Regarding depression categorization, scores from 0 to 4 considered minimal depression, 5–9 considered Mild depression, 10–14 regarded moderate depression, 15–19 considered moderately severe depression and 20–27 considered severe depression [23]. GAD-7 is a seven-item tool to assess the severity of GAD [24]. Scores 0–4 indicate minimal anxiety, 5–9 indicate mild anxiety, 10–14 indicate moderate anxiety, and 15–21 indicate severe anxiety. The Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) is a six-item tool used to screen for fibromyalgia in patients with widespread pain or fatigue. All items are yes or no questions, with patients answering five or more questions as yes, being considered positive for fibromyalgia screening with a Cronbach’s alpha score of 0.7 [25].

Measurement of the social support and quality of life

The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is composed of twelve items that evaluate social support. The MSPSS grades each of its items out of 7, starting at 1 (“very strongly disagree”) and ending at 7 (“very strongly agree”), allowing for a total score between 12 and 84; higher scores correspond to the patient perceiving a higher level of social support [26]. The scale was provided in an Arabic-translated form, which is applicable, reliable, and culturally valid for measuring perceived social support among Arabic-speaking populations in both clinical and research settings which had a high internal consistency with McDonald’s ω values between 0.94 and 0.97 [27].

The Short Form 12-item Survey (SF-12) was used to assess both mental and physical health-related quality of life. The SF-12 is a twelve-item tool, where six items are related to physical health, five are related to mental health, and one addresses both dimensions. Each of the domains is scaled from 0 to 100. The validated Arabic version was used in this study which shows a satisfactory Cronbach’s alpha for both the physical health-related quality of life (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.743) and mental health-related quality of life (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.707) [28].

Statistical analysis

The data analysis was performed using IBM-SPSS v27. Demographic data, laboratory values, organ involvement, treatment regimens, FiRST, MSPSS, PHQ-9, SF-12 and GAD-7 scores were reported as counts and percentages or means and standard deviation. The association between variables and FiRST screening, GAD-7 and PHQ-9 results were tested using Chi-square, Fischer-Exact test or T-test as appropriate. Statistically significant associations on univariate analysis (P-value < 0.05) were reassessed using multivariate binary logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression results were reported using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

Demographic and disease characteristics of the study sample

Sixty-three female patients with SLE were included. The mean age was 40.3 ± 15.3 years, with a mean age of 28.3 ± 12.1 years at the time of SLE diagnosis (Table 1). The most common SLE manifestations were mucocutaneous and hematological manifestations, each affecting 53 patients (84.1%), followed by joint involvement, which was present in 52 patients (82.5%). Constitutional symptoms were present in 40 patients (63.5%), kidney involvement in 19 patients (30.2%), and lung involvement was present in 20 patients (31.7%). The mean SLEDAI score for the patients was 7.6 ± 8.9.

Table 1 Demographic and disease characteristics of the study sample

The most used SLE therapy among our study participants was hydroxychloroquine, which was used by 50 patients (79.4%), while 46 patients (73.0%) were using glucocorticoids. Mycophenolate and azathioprine were also commonly used in 24 patients (38.1%) and 22 patients (34.9%), respectively. The mean ESR was 35.4 ± 25.7 mm/h, and the mean CRP was 6.5 ± 10.5 mg/dl. The mean neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) was 2.6 ± 2.4, while the platelets to lymphocytes ratio (PLR) had a mean of 180.7 ± 111.6 (Table 1). Five patients (7.9%) were thrombocytopenic, thirty-two patients (50.8%) were anemic, and fifteen patients (23.8%) had leukopenia.

Psychosocial characteristics of the study sample

Only one patient (1.6%) was illiterate, while 30 patients (47.6%) had school-level education, and 32 patients (51.2%) had at least a college degree. Thirty patients (47.6%) were unemployed, and 41 patients (65.1%) were married. According to PHQ-9, 22 patients (34.9%) had scores equal to or above 10, which is suggestive of depression. According to PHQ-9 categories, 21 patients (33.3%) had minimal depression, 18 patients (28.6%) had mild depression, 11 patients (17.5%) had moderately severe depression, and five patients (7.9%) had severe depression. In addition, patients were also categorized according to their GAD-7 scores, with 28 (44.4%) patients having minimal anxiety, 16 patients (25.4%) having mild anxiety, 12 patients (19.0) having moderate levels of anxiety, and 7 patients (11.1%) had severe anxiety.

Patients were also assessed for perceived social support using MSPSS; out of a maximum score of 84, the mean scores were 68.0 ± 11.8, indicating high levels of perceived social support. SF-12 was also used to assess patients’ quality of life for both physical and mental domains. Out of a maximum score of 100, the mean PCS-12 scores were 41.9 ± 9.8, and the mean MCS-12 was 51.9 ± 3.4, indicating a moderate level of physical and mental health, respectively. Screening patients for fibromyalgia using FiRST revealed that 20 patients (31.7%) had scores suggestive of fibromyalgia (Table 2).

Table 2 Psychosocial characteristics of the study sample

Factors associated with positive screens for depression, anxiety or fibromyalgia

Testing variables associated with depression based on PHQ-9 scores showed that a significantly higher proportion of patients with FiRST scores suggestive of fibromyalgia have depression (15.4% Vs. 63.6%, P-value < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with depression had lower PCS-12 scores compared with those who didn’t (44.0 Vs. 37.3, P-value = 0.009). Vascular involvement, including Raynaud’s phenomenon, Deep vein Thrombosis (DVT), vasculitis and splenic or kidney infarction, was significantly more common among patients with depression (51.3% Vs. 81.8%, P-value = 0.011). Also, NLR was significantly higher among patients with depression (2.1 Vs. 3.5, P-value = 0.040). Using multivariate logistic regression vascular involvement (OR = 14.9, 95% CI: 1.1-202.4), GAD-7 scores equal or higher than 10 (OR = 38.9, 95% CI: 2.9-524.8) were associated with significantly higher odds of depression (Fig. 1. A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Multivariate logistic regression of factors associated with A: PHQ-9 ≥ 10, B: GAD-7 ≥ 10, C: positive fibromyalgia screening

Testing factors associated with positive anxiety screening using GAD-7 (GAD-7 ≥ 10), positive FiRST screening were significantly higher among patients with anxiety (18.6% Vs 66.7%, P-value < 0.001). In addition, PCS-12 scores were significantly lower among patients with anxiety (45.3 Vs 34.2, P-value < 0.001). Hematological involvement was significantly higher among patients with anxiety (83.7% Vs 94.4%, P-value = 0.049) (Table 3). Using multivariate logistic regression, pstients with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 10 had significantly higher odds of anxiety (OR = 8.1, 95% CI: 1.4–47.6). On the other hand, high PCS-12 scores were significantly associated with lower odds of having positive screening for anxiety (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.804–0.993).

Table 3 Factors associated with depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) and positive GAD screen (GAD-7 ≥ 10)

Regarding factors associated with FiRST levels suggestive of fibromyalgia, kidney involvement was more common among patients with negative FiRST screening (41.5% Vs. 10.0%, P-value = 0.017), but eye involvement was more common among those with positive screening (9.8% Vs. 30.0%, P-value = 0.039) (Table 4). Using multivariate logistic regression, patients with kidney involvement (OR = 0.058, 95% CI: 0.004–0.828) and higher PCS-12 scores (OR = 0.889, 95% CI: 0.79–0.96) had significantly lower odds of positive FiRST screening (Fig. 1C).

Table 4 Factors associated with positive fibromyalgia screen using FiRST

Discussion

This study describes the demographics, clinical, and psychosocial factors affecting a sample of female patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Jordan. Our study’s population had an average age at diagnosis of 28.3 ± 12.1 years, and these findings are similar to those reported by Gheita et al. [29], who found a median age at diagnosis of 25 years in Egyptian patients. In our study, mucocutaneous and hematological symptoms were the most common clinical manifestations, each affecting 84.1% of patients. These findings reflect the global trends, where mucocutaneous symptoms are reported in up to 72% of SLE patients [30], and hematological manifestations affect over 50% of patients [31]. Additionally, renal involvement was found in 30.2% of patients, which aligns with reported kidney involvement rates, which is around 30% in SLE cases [32]. In general, the rate of organ involvement reported in our study was similar to previous studies, including those of Adwan et al., which included 244 female SLE patients from Jordan [33]. Constitutional symptoms, such as fatigue, fever, and weight loss, were reported in 63.5% of patients in our study. Fatigue, the most common and often the most disabling symptom in SLE, significantly impacts patients’ quality of life and contributes to both the physical and mental health burden associated with the disease [34].

Patients with eye involvement were significantly more likely to have fibromyalgia on univariate analysis (9.8% Vs 30.0%). In contrast, the presence of kidney involvement had lower odds of positive fibromyalgia screening (95% CI 0.004–0.828), reflecting the complex and poorly understood mechanism of fibromyalgia [35]. These findings may be explained by the fact that renal involvement is generally less physically perceived by patients compared to ocular manifestations. As a result, the psychological impact of kidney involvement may differ from that of eye involvement.

Patients with SLE are at a higher risk of psychiatric comorbidities, including depression and anxiety [2]. In our study, 38.1% of patients had moderate to severe anxiety levels according to GAD-7, and 34.9% of patients had PHQ-9 scores suggestive of depression. These levels are higher than previously reported levels in Jordan [36]. The prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety, in our study closely aligns with findings from a study in Saudi Arabia, which reported rates of 45.5% for depression and 46.2% for anxiety [37]. Another study conducted in Egypt showed an even higher prevalence of depressive symptoms, reaching 64%. These consistent findings across the region suggest that the experience of women with SLE in Jordan reflects the broader trends seen in neighboring countries and reflects the drastic impact of SLE on the psychosocial aspects of its patients. This was also evident in patients’ PCS-12 scores, where patients who had a positive screening for depression had significantly lower PCS-12 scores (44.0 Vs. 37.3). In addition, the presence of vascular involvement, such as Raynaud’s phenomenon and other vascular manifestations was a predictor for depression on multivariate analysis (OR = 14.9). These findings clearly reflect the well-known link between physical symptoms and depression [38]. The significant association between NLR and depression on univariate analysis (2.1 Vs. 3.5) and the significantly higher scores of CRP among patients with depression further consolidate the association between depression and the current physical status among patients. The association between NLR and depression was also previously reported by Papachristodoulou et al. [39].

The prevalence of fibromyalgia in the general population, according to Heidari et al., is 1.78% with a 95% confidence interval of 1.65–1.9 [40]. In our study, 31.7% of the study population had a positive screening for fibromyalgia, which is also higher than Torrente-Segarra et al.‘s finding, where only 6.2% of SLE patients had fibromyalgia [41]. The presence of fibromyalgia as a comorbid condition negatively affects the quality of life of SLE patients [42]. In our study, patients with better physical quality of life according to PCS-12 had significantly lower odds of fibromyalgia (OR = 0.889), reflecting the complex interplay between symptoms caused by both disorders.

Our study demonstrated that patients reported high levels of perceived social support, with a mean score of 68.0 ± 11.8 on the MSPSS. This underscores the critical role that strong social networks play in helping individuals cope with chronic illnesses like SLE. Similarly, Cheol Bae et al. [43] found that higher levels of social support were associated with better mental health and improved quality of life in SLE patients. A strong support network, along with factors such as higher social class, can help alleviate the emotional stress associated with the disease and enhance overall well-being.

Furthermore, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study in this region to examine the psychological state of women diagnosed with SLE and to establish the relationship between their disease activity and different clinical manifestations in Jordan. On this basis, our study contributes to understanding the specific features of the life experiences of women with lupus and exploring the relationship between mental health status, disease activity, and health-related quality of life. By administering reliable and validated questionnaires to the participants to determine their MSPSS and SF-12 scores, the study learns how SLE affects women in their day-to-day living, state of health and psychological well-being. Some of our findings corroborate the findings of the literature involving female lupus patients in this part of the world, and this study is unique in that it includes emotional and psychological aspects of lupus that have not been previously explored.

We acknowledge some limitations in our study, including the small sample size. In addition, this study’s cross-sectional design limits the dynamic follow-up of how patients’ symptoms and mental status change over time. Our patients had a low mean SLEDAI score, which can make our sample less representative of populations with higher disease activity, limiting the generalizability of the results. In addition, the absence of measures assessing the cumulative damage attributed to SLE and its associations can limit the interpretation of the disease burden and its impact on patients’ well-being. Data was also collected from one center in Amman, the capital of Jordan. We believe further multicentric studies that evaluate the psychosocial burden of SLE are needed. Even though females are affected with SLE more commonly than males, we recommend further studies evaluating the emotional and psychological well-being of males diagnosed with SLE.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study provides an overview of the demographics, clinical manifestations, and psychosocial and emotional factors affecting female patients with an SLE diagnosis in Jordan. Our results showed a significant impact of SLE on physical and mental health. Our study participants had high rates of depression, anxiety and fibromyalgia, which negatively affects patients’ quality of life. The findings of our study were limited by the small sample size and cross-sectional design. Therefore, there is a need for larger, multicentric, and longitudinal studies to allow a better and more comprehensive understanding of the psychological well-being of SLE patients and how it changes over time.

Data availability

Data is available upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SLE:

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

JUH:

Jordan University Hospital

PHQ-9:

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

GAD-7:

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

FiRST:

Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool

SLEDAI:

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index

SF-12:

Short Form 12-item Survey

MSPSS:

Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

PCS-12:

Physical Component Summary (from SF-12)

MCS-12:

Mental Component Summary (from SF-12)

EULAR/ACR:

European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology

SELENA-SLEDAI:

Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index

ESR:

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

CRP:

C-reactive Protein

C3:

Complement Component 3

C4:

Complement Component 4

ds-DNA:

Double-stranded DNA

NLR:

Neutrophils to Lymphocytes Ratio

PLR:

Platelets to Lymphocytes Ratio

DVT:

Deep Vein Thrombosis

COSMIN:

Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments

IBM-SPSS:

International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

OR:

Odds Ratio

CI:

Confidence Interval

References

  1. Fortuna G, Brennan MT. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Dent Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;57(4):631–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cden.2013.06.003

  2. Palagini L, Mosca M, Tani C, Gemignani A, Mauri M, Bombardieri S. Depression and systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Lupus. 2013 Apr;22(5):409–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/0961203313477227

  3. Gergianaki I, et al. Epidemiology and burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in a Southern European population: data from the community-based lupus registry of Crete, Greece. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76(12):1992–2000. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211206

  4. Chakravarty EF, Bush TM, Manzi S, Clarke AE, Ward MM. Prevalence of adult systemic lupus erythematosus in California and Pennsylvania in 2000: estimates using hospitalization data. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun;56(6):2092. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/art.22641

  5. Jiménez S, Cervera R, Font J, Ingelmo M. The epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2003 Aug;25(1):3–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1385/CRIAI:25:1:3.

  6. Petri M. Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Dec;16(5):847–58. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1053/berh.2002.0259

  7. Buskila D, Press J, Abu-Shakra M. Fibromyalgia in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence and clinical implications. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2003;25(1):25–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1385/CRIAI:25:1:25

  8. Middleton GD, Mcfarlin JE, Lipsky PE. The prevalence and clinical impact of fibromyalgia in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Dec;37(8):1181–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/art.1780370812

  9. Moustafa AT, et al. Prevalence and metric of depression and anxiety in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Feb;50(1):84–94. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.06.017

  10. Duca L, Roman NA, Ifteni P, Teodorescu A. One-year outcomes for depression and anxiety in SLE patients. Biomedicines. 2024 Feb;12(3):484. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biomedicines12030484

  11. Kozora E, Ellison MC, Waxmonsky JA, Wamboldt FS, Patterson TL. Major life stress, coping styles, and social support in relation to psychological distress in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2005 May;14(5):363–72. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1191/0961203305lu2094oa

  12. Gençöz T, Özlale Y, Lennon R. Direct and indirect effects of social support on psychological well-being. Soc Behav Pers. 2004 Jan;32(5):449–58. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.5.449

  13. Nugraha S, Poerwandari EK, Lubis DU. The role of perceived social and spiritual support and depression to health-related quality of life on patients with SLE. Glob Med Health Commun. 2021 Dec;9(3). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.29313/gmhc.v9i3.8803.

  14. Elefante E, et al. Impact of disease activity patterns on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Jul;11(2):e001202. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/lupus-2024-001202.

  15. Mokkink LB, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539–49. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.

  16. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Designing, conducting, and reporting survey studies: A primer for researchers. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec;38(48):e403. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e403

  17. Aringer M, et al. European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1400–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/art.40930

  18. Petri M, et al. Combined oral contraceptives in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec;353(24):2550–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1056/NEJMoa051135

  19. Bombardier C, et al. Derivation of the SLEDAI: A disease activity index for lupus patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1992 Jun;35(6):630–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/art.1780350606

  20. Khoury-Malhame ME, Hallit S, Sanchez-Ruiz M-J, Hajj SE, Doumit R. Psychometric validation of the Arabic version of the GAD-7 among Lebanese adolescents. 2024 Jun 14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4486990/v1.

  21. AlHadi AN, et al. An Arabic translation, reliability, and validation of Patient Health Questionnaire in a Saudi sample. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;16(1):32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12991-017-0155-1.

  22. Parperis K, et al. Association of clinical characteristics, disease activity and health-related quality of life in SLE patients with major depressive disorder. Rheumatology. 2021 Nov;60(11):5369–78. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/rheumatology/keab123

  23. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

  24. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May;166(10):1092. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

  25. AlAujan SS, Almalag HM, Assiri GA, Alodaibi FA, Omair MA. Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST): Arabic translation and cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Healthcare. 2023 Mar;11(7):961. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/healthcare11070961

  26. Ong HL, et al. Resilience and burden in caregivers of older adults: moderating and mediating effects of perceived social support. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;18(1):27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12888-018-1616-z.

  27. Fekih-Romdhane F, Fawaz M, Hallit R, Sawma T, Obeid S, Hallit S. Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the multidimensional social support scale (MSPSS) in a community sample of adults. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;23(1):432. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12888-023-04937-z

  28. Haddad C, Sacre H, Obeid S, Salameh P, Hallit S. Validation of the Arabic version of the “12-item short-form health survey” (SF-12) in a sample of Lebanese adults. Arch Public Health. 2021 Apr;79(1):56. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13690-021-00579-3.

  29. Gheita TA, et al. Adult systemic lupus erythematosus in Egypt: The nation-wide spectrum of 3661 patients and world-wide standpoint. Lupus. 2021 Aug;30(9):1526–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/09612033211014253

  30. Raafat HA, El Refai RM, Alrasheed HA, El Din MN. Major depression and disease activity among systemic lupus erythematosus Egyptian females. The Egyptian Rheumatologist. 2015 Oct;37(4):S1–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ejr.2015.09.007.

  31. Velo-García A, Castro SG, Isenberg DA. The diagnosis and management of the haematologic manifestations of lupus. J Autoimmun. 2016 Nov;74:139–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jaut.2016.07.001.

  32. Somers EC, et al. Population‐based incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: The Michigan Lupus Epidemiology and Surveillance Program. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):369–78. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/art.38238

  33. Adwan MH, et al. Insights into systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective observational study of clinical features, autoantibodies, and gender-related differences. Rheumatol Int. 2024 May;44(7):1255–63. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00296-024-05592-7.

  34. Kawka L, Schlencker A, Mertz P, Martin T, Arnaud L. Fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus: An update on its impact, determinants and therapeutic management. JCM. 2021 Sep;10(17):3996. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/jcm10173996

  35. Albrecht PJ, Rice FL. Fibromyalgia syndrome pathology and environmental influences on afflictions with medically unexplained symptoms. Rev Environ Health. 2016 Jun;31(2). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1515/reveh-2015-0040.

  36. Hamdan-Mansour AM, Ghannam BM, Abeiat DDA, Badawi THA, Thultheen IN, Shamali IM. Predicting depression among Jordanian patients diagnosed with physical illnesses. PSYCH. 2014;5(19):2120–30. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4236/psych.2014.519214

  37. Hasan MA, et al. Anxiety and depression and associated risk factors among outpatients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;14(2):486–97. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/clinpract14020037

  38. Olver JS, Hopwood MJ. Depression and physical illness. Med J Aust. 2013 Oct;199(S6). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5694/mja12.10597

  39. Papachristodoulou E, Kakoullis L, Christophi C, Psarelis S, Hajiroussos V, Parperis K. The relationship of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with health-related quality of life, depression, and disease activity in SLE: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int. 2023 Jul;43(10):1841–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00296-023-05381-8

  40. Heidari F, Afshari M, Moosazadeh M. Prevalence of fibromyalgia in general population and patients, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1527–39. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00296-017-3725-2.

  41. Torrente-Segarra V, et al. Fibromyalgia prevalence and related factors in a large registry of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34(2 Suppl 96):S40–7.

  42. Araújo ALPKD, Paliares IC, Araújo MIPKD, Novo NF, Cadaval RAM, Martinez JE. A Associação fibromialgia e lúpus eritematoso sistêmico altera a Apresentação e a Gravidade de Ambas as Doenças? Rev Bras Reumatol. 2015 Jan;55(1):37–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.rbr.2014.08.004.

  43. Bae SC, Hashimoto H, Karlson EW, Liang MH, Daltroy LH. Variable effects of social support by race, economic status, and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2001 Jun;28(6):1245–51.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr. Joud Alkarmi for her significant contributions to developing the data collection sheet and the comprehensive literature review.

Funding

No funding was provided for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FA: principal investigator, supervising data collection, data synthesis, manuscript drafting and finalizing the final draft. OH: data analysis, manuscript drafting and approving the final draft. ZAA, RBH, DA: literature review, designing data collection sheet, data Collection. TN, MM and NA: literature review, drafting the manuscript and approving the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatima Alnaimat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Jordan University Hospital approved the study, and IRB approval number was (10/2023/30525). All procedures followed the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and adhered to the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alnaimat, F., Hamdan, O., Natsheh, T. et al. Exploring the influence of social support, disease activity, and fibromyalgia on the emotional well-being of women with systemic lupus erythematosus. BMC Rheumatol 9, 26 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s41927-025-00476-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s41927-025-00476-0

Keywords